Plavix Linked to Increased Risk of Heart Attack in Some Patients

March 12th, 2010

The FDA Issues a Black Box Warning: Plavix May Lead to Heart Attack / Stroke in Some Patients

This morning, the FDA issued a black box warning in regards to Plavix, one of the most popular blood thinners prescribed to millions of patients worldwide. According to the latest reports, some patients may not be able to metabolize the drug due to an insufficient amount of a certain type of liver enzyme responsible for breaking down the drug into its active form, putting them at a risk for heart attack or stroke.

According to the FDA, between 2 to 14 percent of Americans may not be able to process Plavix. The ability to metabolize Plavix may vary by race.

Patients can determine if they are at risk by taking a genetic test. They should discuss their options with their healthcare professional prior to discontinuing the drug.

Plavix is manufactured by Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb and is designed to prevent blood clots. A spokesperson for Bristol-Myers has announced that the company plans on adding new labels to Plavix within two months.

If you or a loved one has suffered a heart attack or stroke while on Plavix, please contact the AWKO defective drug team at (888) 255-2956. The lawyers of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis and Overholtz are Florida’s premier personal injury attorneys and can help you obtain compensation for your medical bills and emotional distress.


African American’s At Risk of Heart Attacks and Strokes on Plavix

March 12th, 2010

Bristol Myers Squibb and Sanofi which co-promote and market Plavix (Clopidogrel Bisulfate) is under fire again. Last time, it was for drug Plavix causing Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), a typically rare yet very serious and potentially fatal condition where blood clots form in the arteries and block blood flow to organs, including the brain, kidneys, and other vital organs thereby damaging them. Now, after Bristol and Sanofi thought they had stamped out all of the embers regarding bad propensities of their multi-million dollar drug, science and medicine have caught up with legal theories as to why Plavix has historically caused an unreasonably high and unreported increased risk to the African American community. This risk as described below is due to metabolization differences among ethnic groups which is widely known in the scientific community. Plavix essentially raises the risk of heart attacks and strokes amoung African Americans due to an increased risk among people with a particular genetic make up which does not metabolize Plavix as necessary based on standard dosing regimens. What results is a risk of clotting. This risk is prominent in African Americans who have had stent placement to keep arteries open as well as described in detail below.

For some history, in 1997, the following was recognized:

Plavix is associated with a lower metabolization rate in people with the CYP2C19 polymorphism gene trait. CYP2C19 polymorphism has been identified as markedly increased in African American’s as compared to Caucasians and Africans. See The incidence of CYP2C19 polymorphism (most common subtype *2) in African Americans was 25%, which was higher than that reported in Africans or Caucasians. See Goldstein JA, Ishizaki T, Chiba K, et al. Frequencies of the defective CYP2C19 alleles responsible for the mephenytoin poor metabolizer phenotype in various Oriental, Caucasian, Saudi Arabian and American black populations. Pharmacogenetics 1997; 7(1): 59-64.

Accordinly, this race specific connection has been known for over a decade. To our knowledge, there has never been an attempt by Bristol or Sanofi to expressly state that African Americans (”AA community”) are at increased risk of not having plavix metabolize well leading to a risk of thrombosis or clotting. Rather, ironically, they mention Caucasians and Asians in their label but fail to provide any reference to the AA community of patients except for some brief data described below. The label as of the July 17, 2009 (which was when this passing reference to “blacks” was first inserted strangely from a 2001 study – on AAs of seven published studies in 2008 and 2009):

Several polymorphic CYP450 enzymes activate clopidogrel. CYP2C19 is involved in the formation of both the active metabolite and the 2-oxo-clopidogrel intermediate metabolite. Clopidogrel active metabolite pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet effects, as measured by ex vivo platelet aggregation assays, differ according to CYP2C19 genotype. The CYP2C19*1 allele corresponds to fully functional metabolism while the CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 alleles correspond to reduced metabolism. The CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 alleles account for 85% of reduced function alleles in whites and 99% in Asians. Other alleles associated with reduced metabolism include CYP2C19*4, *5, *6, *7, and *8, but these are less frequent in the general population. Published frequencies for the common CYP2C19 phenotypes and genotypes are listed in the table below.

Table 1 – CYP2C19 Phenotype and Genotype Frequency

Frequency (%)*

White (n=1356)
Black (n=966)
Chinese (n=573)

Extensive metabolism: CYP2C19*1/*1
74
66
38

Intermediate metabolism: CYP2C19*1/*2 or *1/*3
26
29
50

Poor metabolism: CYP2C19*2/*2, *2/*3 or *3/*3
2
4
14

Xie, et al. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2001; 41: 815-50

To date, the impact of CYP2C19 genotype on the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel’s active metabolite has been evaluated in 227 subjects from 7 reported studies. Reduced CYP2C19 metabolism in intermediate and poor metabolizers decreased the Cmax and AUC of the active metabolite by 30-50% following 300- or 600 mg loading doses and 75 mg maintenance doses. Lower active metabolite exposure results in less platelet inhibition or higher residual platelet reactivity. To date, diminished antiplatelet responses to clopidogrel have been described for intermediate and poor metabolizers in 21 reported studies involving 4,520 subjects. The relative difference in antiplatelet response between genotype groups varies across studies depending on the method used to evaluate response, but is typically greater than 30%.

The association between CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel treatment outcome was evaluated in 2 post-hoc clinical trial analyses (substudies of CLARITY-TIMI 281 [n=465] and TRITON-TIMI 382 [n=1,477]) and 5 cohort studies (total n=6,489). In CLARITY-TIMI 28 and one of the cohort studies (n=765; Trenk3), cardiovascular event rates did not differ significantly by genotype. In TRITON-TIMI 38 and 3 of the cohort studies (n= 3,516; Collet,4 Sibbing,5 Giusti6), patients with an impaired metabolizer status (intermediate and poor combined) had a higher rate of cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) or stent thrombosis compared to extensive metabolizers. In the fifth cohort study (n=2,208; Simon7), the increased event rate was observed only in poor metabolizers.

Pharmacogenetic testing can identify genotypes associated with variability in CYP2C19 activity.

There may be genetic variants of other CYP450 enzymes with effects on the ability to form clopidogrel’s active metabolite.

——————————————————————————–

1 Mega JL, Thakuria JV, Cannon CP, Sabatine MS. Sequence variations in CYP metabolism genes and cardiovascular outcomes following treatment with clopidogrel: insights from the CLARITY-TIMI 28 genomic study. 2008; ACC Meeting Abstract

2 Mega et al. Cytochrome P-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:354-62

3 Trenk et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 681G>A polymorphism and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity associated with adverse 1-year clinical outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting or bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51, 20: 1952

4 Collet JP et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism in young patients treated with clopidogrel after myocardial infarction: a cohort study. The Lancet 2009; 373: 309-317

5 Sibbing D et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism and stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2009:1-7

6 Giusti et al. Relation of cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism to occurrence of drug-eluting coronary stent thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103:806–811

7 Simon et al. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(4):363-75

So, the above is what the Plavix label reflects. No one can suggest that this properly put anyone much less physicians and AA patients on notice of this 25% increase risk.

Here is a very recent publication which restates what has been known know and should have been both recognized and acted upon re: AA’s from:

Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010 Feb 18. Relation of CYP2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism to the occurrence of stent thrombosis. Giusti B, Gori AM, Marcucci R, Abbate R. Researcher in Clinical Pathology, University of Florence and SOD Atherothrombotic Diseases, Department of Medical and Surgical Critical Care, AOU Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134 Florence, Italy +390557949420 ; +390557949418 ;
Importance of the field: Major adverse cardiovascular events including stent thrombosis associated with residual platelet reactivity on antiplatelet treatment in high risk vascular patients is a hot issue that needs a strong effort to be solved. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin prevents ischemic events and improves outcomes following acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. However, adverse cardiovascular events occur in these patients, and several studies have shown that patients who suffer cardiovascular complications have high post-treatment platelet reactivity despite antiplatelet treatment. Clopidogrel requires conversion to active metabolite by CYP isoenzymes. Recently, CYP2C19*2 polymorphism (G681A nucleotide substitution) has been shown to be associated with decreased metabolisation of clopidogrel, poor antiaggregant effect and increased adverse cardiovascular events. Areas covered in this review: This review summarises the principal studies contributing to establish the relationship between CYP2C19*2 polymorphism and adverse outcomes in high risk patients on clopidogrel treatment. Take home message: Prospective studies are urgently needed to determine the clinical impact of a score that takes into account individual characteristics of patients – CYP2C19*2 genotypes, residual platelet reactivity, drug-drug interaction, as well as traditional and procedural risk factors – for the identification of the therapeutic strategy that provides the best benefit for the single subject.

The Plavix label was slow i.e. 8 years from Xie report to include any reference to the genetic predisposition of certain people having metabolization issues with clopidogrel the label should more adequately warn African American. More recently, this was reported in literature re: use in conjunction with Stents which raises this issue within that context, however, we believe that any African American who suffered a thrombotic even while on Plavix has a legal claim.

We stand poised to represent and litigate any such claims against the manufacturers of Plavix. For a free consultation, please call toll free 877-810-4808 or visit us at: www.awkolaw.com.


DePuy ASR Hip Implants Recall – DePuy ASR Lawsuits

March 11th, 2010

DePuy announces recall of ASR hip implants amid concerns about high rates of failure and revision surgery

DePuy Orthopaedics has acknowledged the high failure rate of its ASR hip implant. The ARS device, one of several models sold by DePuy — the orthopedic arm of Johnson & Johnson — is known as a “metal-on-metal” implant. Hip implants typically last 15 years or more, but doctors have been reporting that the ASR implant has been failing as soon as two years after implantation.

ASR is used in total hip replacement and hip resurfacing, in which the patient’s bones are kept largely intact but covered with material. Although the ASR resurfacing system has not been approved by the FDA for use in the United States, it has been used abroad for years. In addition, the FDA approved use of ASR components in traditional total hip replacements in 2005. Since then, many U.S. patients have received ASR hip components.

Australian researchers, led by Stephen Graves, MD, have provided scientific support to doctor reports of ASR failures. Reviewing 12,000 hip replacement cases, they found that patients with the ASR implant require revision surgery significantly sooner than patients with other, similar devices. Responding to this data in December 2009, DePuy removed ASR from the market in Australia. Also in late 2009, DePuy stated that it would phase out sales of ASR worldwide, but denied that this decision was related to safety concerns.

On March 6, however, the company publicly addressed ASR’s higher-than-normal failure rate, stating, based on a review of the Australian data, “this is new and important information surgeons who continue to use ASR should have to inform their clinical decision making.”

Orthopedic surgeons believe there may be a couple reasons for the ASR device’s faster-than-normal rate of failure. Experts believe that because the ASR is a metal-on-metal device, it may generate too much metallic debris. This debris, in turn, may cause a severe inflammation response, leading to damage in muscles and other soft tissue.

Some doctors also argue that the socket component of the ASR may be especially difficult to implant properly. The poor outcomes with ASR may result from the fact that the cup component is shallower than that of other, similar devices.

Many doctors insist that DePuy knew about the ASR failure two years ago, but failed to inform patients or address the problem. Since the start of 2008, the FDA has received about 300 complaints regarding the ASR implant, most involving patients who had the implant removed soon after receiving it.

If you believe that you or someone you love has been harmed by DePuy’s failure to act sooner in response to failures in its product, consult an experience defective medical devices attorney at AWKO Law at (888) 255-2956.


Fosamax Linked to Femur Fractures

March 10th, 2010

Doctors Report Increase in Femur Fractures Among Patients Taking Fosamax for Osteoporosis

In addition to previously observed side effects of Fosamax, including osteonecrosis of the jaw, headache, nausea and rashes, doctors now report an increasing incidence of femur fractures among long-term users of the drug.

Although Fosamax is prescribed to strengthen bones in women suffering from osteoporosis, some doctors have noted that taking Fosamax for five years or longer may actually cause the bones to become more brittle, increasing some women’s risk of spontaneous fracture.

According to Dr. Kenneth Egol, a professor of Orthopedic Surgery at NYU Langone Medical Center, femur fractures have been experienced by “people just walking down the steps, patients who are doing low-energy exercise.” He characterizes such fractures as “very unusual” because “the femur is one of the strongest bones in the body.”

In 2008, the FDA contacted Merk & Co. — the pharmaceutical company that manufactures Fosamax — about the reports of femur fractures. Merck allowed 16 months to pass before adding fracture risk to the list of possible side effects of Fosamax.

Merck continues to insist that no causal link between Fosamax and femur fractures has been established. However, a study in Denmark reported a positive link between Fosamax and femur fractures in 2008. Additional research is expected to be published in March 9, 2010.

Although no recommendations were made for the length of treatment with Fosamax, some physicians are now suggesting that Fosamax treatment be limited to five years.

If you believe that you or a loved one has been harmed by side effects resulting from Fosamax, you may be entitled to financial compensation to cover medical bills, lost income or other expenses. Contact an expert personal injury attorney at (888) 255-2956. The AWKO team boasts some of the most experienced personal injury lawyers Pensacola, Florida has to offer.


Study Finds Link Between Tricholorethylene (TCE) and Parkinson’s

March 10th, 2010

Tricholorethylene (TCE) Exposure Increases Risk of Parkinson’s Disease

Exposure to the industrial chemical tricholorethylene (TCE) is associated with a higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, according to a new study. TCE is a solvent once widely used in dry cleaning and to clean grease off metal such as auto parts. Its use has been curtailed due to concerns over its health affects.

In the study, researchers examined the job histories of 99 pairs of twins in which one of the twins had Parkinson’s disease. Those exposed to TCE in the workplace were five and a half times more likely to have Parkinson’s than those not exposed to the chemical. The twins who were exposed to TCE had job histories that included work as machinists, dry cleaners, electricians and mechanics.

Twins were used in the study because they are genetically similar and thus provide excellent subjects for evaluating environmental affects. The twins were men identified from a study known as the World War II-Veterans Twins Cohort study.

“This is the first time a population-based study has confirmed case reports that exposure to TCE may increase a person’s risk of developing Parkinson’s disease,” stated the author of the study, Samuel Goldman, MD. Dr. Goldman is affiliated with the Parkinson’s Institute in Sunnyvale, California, and is a member of the American Academy of Neurology.

The study will be presented at the American Academy of Neurology’s 62nd Annual Meeting in Toronto.


Fosamax found to weaken bones rather than strengthen them

March 10th, 2010

Doctors are reporting increases in unusual bone fractures over the past 18 months in patients taking the Merck osteoporosis drug Fosamax (alendronate).

As pressure increases for the Merck or the FDA to act, doctors say they are seeing more patients coming to them with fractures that happen during normal daily activities, as Dr. Kenneth Egol, professor of orthopedic surgery at NYU Langone Medical Center explained to ABC News in a recent interview.

“We are seeing people just walking, walking down the steps, patients who are doing low-energy exercise,” said Dr. Ego. “Very unusual, the femur is one of the strongest bones in the body.”

“Over the last 18 months we are seeing this more frequently,” Dr. Ego said.

Doctors prescribe Fosamax to treat osteoporosis and osteopenia.  The drug is supposed to strengthen bones to offset bone-weakening problems.  Instead, the mounting evidence shows it can do exactly the opposite, causing serious injury.

Fosamax scrare strikes women with osteopenia ( ABC News)

Fosamax: Is long-term use of bone strengthening drug linked to fractures? (ABC News)

Will side-effect reports scare Fosamax patients? (ABC News)

The law firm of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz (AWKO Law) is actively engaged in defective drug litigation.  For more information about patients’ legal rights, Merck Fosamax patients and their families can contact the lawyers of AWKO Law at www.awkolaw.com (888-255-2956).



DePuy halts ASR hip implant much too late

March 10th, 2010

After more than two years of problem reports, DePuy Orthopaedics finally decided to withdraw its ASR hip implants from the market, because the ASR hip implant was failing in traditional hip replacements only a few years after implant, requiring costly and painful replacement operations.

DePuy ASR hip implant defective - chart showing increasing complaints to FDAIn a March 6 letter to doctors, DePuy admitted that the “metal-on-metal” ASR hip implant has a high failure rate and should not be used in traditional hip replacements.  A DePuy statement to the press admitted that “this is new and important information surgeons who continue to use ASR should have to inform their clinical decision making.”

The ASR model is often used in “hip resurfacing,” which is an alternative to traditional hip replacement. However, this method is not approved for use in the United States. The FDA has only approved the ASR for use in traditional hip replacement.

The FDA has received about 300 complaints about the ASR since 2008. Most of the patients lodging complaints had undergone an operation to replace the implant.  It was only after Johnson & Johnson saw slowing sales of the hip implant that they made the announcement that the device is unsafe.

Some surgeons have long said they believe the ASR design is defective and is prone to problems.  Orthopedic experts had recently been very critical of the hip implant, saying DePuy should have stopped selling the device much sooner.

DePuy withdrew the ASR from the Australian market in December, but kept it on the American market until the March 6 announcement.

The law firm of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz (AWKO Law) has been actively engaged in defective medical device litigation for years.  For more information about patients’ legal rights, DePuy ASR patients and their families can contact the lawyers of AWKO Law at www.awkolaw.com (888-255-2956).


California county files Avandia class action against GSK

March 2nd, 2010

A California county has filed a class action lawsuit against Avandia-maker GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), claiming GSK hid evidence that Avandia increases the risk of heart attacks.

County officials in Santa Clara County, in northern California, say they believe this is the first time a government body has sued GSK over Avandia.

The lawsuit follows the release of a U.S. Senate report last month charging that Glaxo minimized Avandia’s safety risks and withheld data from the Food and Drug Administration.

The lawsuits seeks restitution of expenses for all Avandia purchasers in California, including individuals and health care providers.

AP News story (March 2, 2010)

Voice of America story (March 2, 2010)

AboutLawsuits.com (March 2, 2010)

Avandia details & lawsuit information (www.awkolaw.com)

Numerous Avandia users have filed lawsuits against GSK over the past several years, as more patients suffer heart attacks, heart failure, and other problems after using Avandia. The law firm of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz (AWKO Law) has been actively engaged in the litigation for years, including a leadership role in the national Avandia multi-district litigation (MDL), which consolidates thousands of lawsuits to streamline the information discovery process.  For more information about patients’ legal rights, Avandia users and their families can contact the lawyers of AWKO Law at www.AWKOLAW.com (888-255-2956).


Dr. Steven Nissen affirms Avandia risks

March 1st, 2010

The doctor that helped focus scientific scrutiny on the heart dangers of Avandia says the diabetes drug remains controversial.

“Many physicians have stopped prescribing Avandia,” Dr. Nissen said.

Dr. Nissen points out, in a recent US News column, that the American Diabetes Association guidelines do not recommend taking Avandia.  A different drug, marketed as Actos (pioglitazone) treats diabetes in the same way, without the same heart attack and heart failure risks posed by Avandia, said Dr. Nissen. Actos is made and sold by Takeda, a Japanese company. Avandia is sold by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

“In July, the FDA will convene an advisory panel to consider what action to take, including the possibility of removing the drug from the market,” Dr. Nissen said.

A recent Senate report harshly criticized GSK for hiding information that shows Avanida causes heart attacks and heart failures.


American Heart Association’s Defense of Avandia (Questionable Motives)

February 27th, 2010

The always provocative blogger, Jim Edwards, who has historically printed some extremely insightful columns on the pharmaceutical industry, is at it again. This time, the motivations behind the American Heart Association’s suggestion that recent reports and findings that Avandia (Rosiglitazone) is associated with cardiac risks are “inconclusive”.

The content of Jim’s recent blog is copied here for all viewers to read (or click here):

After Taking $3.6M From Its Maker Glaxo
By | Feb 26, 2010
Jim Edwards

The American Heart Association said that the data are “inconclusive” on whether GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)’s diabetes drug Avandia carries an increased risk of heart problems. But the organization’s statement does not disclose the fact that GSK gave AHA more than $3.6 million in donations since 2006.

The AHA has slipped up on disclosure issues before. In 2008, the company put out a statement saying it did not believe Vytorin was “unsafe” after a study of the cholesterol drug found it did not reduce artery plaque. Only later did it highlight the fact that Schering-Plough and Merck (MRK), Vytorin’s marketers, were big donors to AHA.

Getting to the bottom of whether Avandia does or does not increase heart attacks in its patients is crucial, both for the thousands of patients who still take the drug and for GSK, which earned $310 million in revenues on Avandia in Q4 2009. The data are, indeed, confusing, and you can cherry-pick arguments from them that support both sides.

The fact that the AHA — which millions trust for its advice on heart health — has not properly disclosed its apparent financial conflict of interest in either its press release or its full statement in the journal Circulation, is therefore disappointing. (I’m not suggesting that the authors of the statement have let money get in the way of their science, just that appearances of conflicts ought to be disclosed.) The AHA said:

The data are inconclusive on heart risks from a class of blood sugar-lowering drugs called thiazolidinediones (TZDs) such as pioglitazone (Actos) or rosiglitazone (Avandia), but the medications should be used with close monitoring from healthcare providers

In AHA’s 2008-2009 fiscal year, the last period for which numbers are available, the organization received $131 million in funding from drug and medical device companies. Of that, $600,000 came from GSK. Historically, the company has been a generous donor to AHA:

GSK donations to AHA by year:
$600,000 in ‘08-’09
$940,353 in ‘07-’08
$2.055 million in ‘06-’07
Total: $3.6 million