Archive for the ‘Heart Devices’ Category

Guidant

Friday, May 2nd, 2008

Please see attached the Guidant Release Form Signature Pages. Please click on the link to the document and either save or print out. You must and fill out the first form completely, sign where indicated in the presence of a Notary Public. Please have your spouse sign on the spouse signature line, also in the presence of the Notary public. All signatures must be notarized. You must return the completed form, and notarized signed documents to us by Monday, May 5 at 4 P.M. EST, or 3 P.M. CST. You may return by fax to 850-916-7449, or by scanning and emailing to pbarr@awkolaw.com if you fax or email, you may return the originals by mail. Failure to retunr properly signed and notarized release forms with signatures by claimant, and their spouse, or in a death case, signature of the person who will be personal representative, could jeopardize the ability to receive a settlement in the Guidant case.

You may return the originals by federal express or other overnight shipper to our address: 803 N. Palafox Street, Pensacola, Florida 32501, but you would have to get the federal express out by Saturday for Monday delivery.

Please call with any question- toll free 877-810-4808.

Thank you,
Guidant Litigation Group

Heart Doctors report Risks of Defibrillator and Pacemaker Hacking- Possible Compromise of Patient Safety?

Wednesday, March 12th, 2008

In another blow to patient confidence in pacemakers and defibrillators, Keith Weinstein of the WSJ report in Heart-Device Hacking Risks Seen, that physicians studying the vulnerability of pacemakers and defibrillators have demostrated that such devices may be prone to cyber-attacks, or hacks, that could potentially compromise patient privacy, or even worse patient safety. A massive Medtronic defibrillator recall and Boston Scientific / Guidant Pacemaker recall in 2005 has played an impoortant role in raising concerns regarding heart device safety.

According to the report, Physicians use a device called a “Programmer” to communcate with the device wirelessly. The Programmer allows the Dr. to tell the device at what rate to pace a heart, and when to send what should be life saving charges to start a heart that has fallen into a fatal arrythmia.

According to the researchers, computer hackers could transmit the same radio signals used by the programmers to a patient’s device and potentially cause a defibrillator to shock or shut down, or reveal confidential patient data.

The study, urges Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and St. Jude to develop secure methods to “stop unauthorized people from hacking into the implanted medical devices that receive instructions via radio waves, a growing category that also includes spinal-cord stimulators and drug-delivery pumps.”

“This report demonstrates that you can obtain private information without authorization. You can reprogram the device without authorization,” according to William Maisel,from Harvard. Dr. Maisel further stated “our report is a theoretical risk, not an actual risk” and said there was no reason for anybody to consider deferring an implantation or removing a defibrillator.

“I find it absolutely terrifying, the idea of having computer-controlled devices implanted in us,” said Aviel Rubin, a professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins University who wasn’t involved in the research. “If you can imagine what you might do in a very busy area, sending out a signal that would cause all of the people in the local area’s implanted devices to start operating incorrectly, it’s a really scary future we’re headed towards.”

According to the WSJ report, Dr. Maisel and his collaborators — Kevin Fu of the University of Massachusetts, and Tadayoshi Kohno of the University of Washington, both computer-science professors — emphasized that the findings are as yet limited to one model of defibrillator made by Medtronic, the Medtronic Maximo, which was subject to a previous Medtronic recall related to a defective medtronic battery.