AI Personal Injury Lawsuits

Yes. AI companies are not immune from the law. The legal theory is straightforward: if a company builds a product, it has a responsibility to make sure that product does not hurt users. When it does, these companies can be held accountable the same way a car manufacturer or drug company can be held accountable for a defective product.

We focus on documented product failures where an AI system caused or amplified serious harm. The strongest cases often involve:

• Self-harm and suicide. This includes situations where a chatbot encouraged self-harm, helped plan a suicide attempt, or failed to alert a family member or emergency services when a user expressed suicidal intent. AI companies have a duty to intervene
• Compulsive or addictive AI use. If you or a loved one requires mental health treatment or therapy as a direct result of compulsive, addictive, or dependency-driven AI chatbot use, including withdrawal from real-world relationships, that is a distinct category of harm we pursue.
• AI-assisted violence. If you or a loved one were the victim of violence, including a mass casualty event, domestic violence, or stalking, that was brought about or meaningfully facilitated by an AI chatbot, we want to hear from you.
• Dangerous health or medical advice. AI chatbots that substitute for licensed care and provide unsafe guidance on symptoms, medications, or mental health treatment can cause serious harm when that guidance goes wrong.
• Youth harm. Sexual content, self-harm dialogue, or unsafe interactions involving a minor.
• Defamation via AI. Verifiably false allegations propagated by the platform.

We look for three things: (1) records showing how much time was spent on the platform, (2) evidence that a mental or emotional condition developed or got worse after using it, and (3) proof that the platform could have stepped in but didn’t. We work with medical experts and forensic analysts to connect the dots between the platform’s failures and the harm that followed.

Save everything. That includes full chat logs, screenshots, device backups, cloud backups, billing records, and platform credentials. Do not delete conversations, clear caches, or factory reset devices. Do not uninstall the app. If possible, keep the device in airplane mode or powered off until you speak with us. The sooner we can get involved, the better chance we have of recovering what we need.

Nothing. Your initial consultation is free and confidential. We work on a contingency fee basis—meaning you pay nothing upfront, and we only get paid if we recover compensation for you. If we take your case, our fee comes out of the settlement or verdict.

Protecting the victim's identity, especially for minors, is our top priority. Federal law prohibits public disclosure of the identity of minors who are victims of sexual exploitation, and courts routinely allow victims to proceed under a pseudonym ("Jane Doe", “John Doe”, or "Minor Plaintiff A" ) rather than their real names. Our attorneys seek protective orders early in the process to keep identifying information out of public filings.

Tragically, most people find out the same way they find out about any online harm: someone else sees it and tells them. Tools like those provided by the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) and StopNCII.org exist to help track and flag images as they circulate. Some law enforcement agencies proactively notify families when images surface during an investigation, but many victims never find out at all. If you have any reason to suspect your child's images have been altered or misused, you don't need proof or to have seen anything yourself. Reaching out to an attorney is the right first step.

Yes. You do not need to identify the responsible platform before contacting an attorney. That is part of what attorneys and their investigators are there to do. What matters most right now is that you come forward. The earlier an attorney can get involved, the better the chance of preserving evidence that platforms might otherwise delete. Do not wait until you have all the answers before reaching out

Courts handling these cases follow strict protocols to prevent further dissemination. Attorneys use code identifiers rather than the images themselves, and any review happens under tightly controlled conditions with protective orders restricting access. Our team will walk you through exactly what protections we'll seek before anything is filed.