{"id":4364,"date":"2021-12-15T18:21:55","date_gmt":"2021-12-15T18:21:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/?p=4364"},"modified":"2023-06-16T20:25:30","modified_gmt":"2023-06-16T20:25:30","slug":"3m-hit-with-22-5-million-verdict-in-earplug-test-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/3m-hit-with-22-5-million-verdict-in-earplug-test-case\/","title":{"rendered":"3M Hit With $22.5 Million Verdict in Earplug Test Case"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” sticky_enabled=”0″][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.20.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” sticky_enabled=”0″][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” custom_padding=”0px|25px|25px|25px|false|true” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Dec. 13, 2021<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

A federal jury in Florida has awarded the highest amount to date against\u00a03M Co.\u00a0among bellwether trials over allegedly ineffective combat earplugs, concluding the company owes an Army veteran $22.5 million for his hearing loss and tinnitus.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Theodore Finley\u2019s award consists of $7.5 million in compensatory damages and $15 million in punitive damages, according to his counsel.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Finley\u2019s trial was the eighth in the massive consolidated litigation against 3M and its Aearo Technologies LLC subsidiary over Aearo Combat Arms version 2 earplugs.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cJuries continue to find that 3M\u2019s earplugs were defective and that they are responsible for causing irreparable hearing damage to those who served our country,\u201d said a statement from the servicemembers\u2019 counsel, Aylstock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz PLLC; Clark, Love & Hutson GP; and Seeger Weiss LLP.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is also the second jury in a row that found beyond a reasonable doubt that 3M\u2019s conduct was reprehensible and deserving of severe punishment,\u201d they said in an emailed statement Dec. 10, immediately after the verdict.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

3M said in a statement emailed Monday that while it is disappointed in the verdict, \u201cwe are only halfway through the bellwether process.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cJuries differ, each case must be proved on its individual facts, and our successes thus far illustrate the heavy burden plaintiffs must meet in proving the elements of their claims,\u201d the company said. \u201cWe remain confident that the CAEv2 product was safe and effective to use and will continue to defend ourselves throughout this litigation.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Six individual trials and a consolidated trial of three veterans\u2019 claims preceded Finley\u2019s. They resulted in plaintiffs\u2019 verdicts for six service members totaling about $30 million, while 3M\u2019s defense succeeded in three of the trials.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Chief Judge Mark E. Walker of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida oversaw Finley\u2019s trial.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Monsour Law Firm, Gibbs Law Group, and the Thomas J. Henry firm also represented Finley.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Kirkland & Ellis LLP; Moore, Hill & Westmoreland PA; and Dechert LLP represented the defendants.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The case is Finley v. 3M Co., N.D. Fla., No. 7:20-cv-00170, verdict 12\/10\/21.(Corrects name of presiding judge and adds plaintiff’s counsel’s firm in paragraphs nine and 10 of Dec. 13 story.)<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

To contact the reporter on this story:\u00a0Martina Barash\u00a0in Washington at\u00a0mbarash@bloomberglaw.com<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

To contact the editors responsible for this story:\u00a0Rob Tricchinelli\u00a0at\u00a0rtricchinelli@bloomberglaw.com<\/a>;\u00a0Patrick L. Gregory\u00a0at\u00a0pgregory@bloomberglaw.com<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Source: Bloomberg Law<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A federal jury in Florida has awarded the highest amount to date against 3M Co. among bellwether trials over allegedly ineffective combat earplugs, concluding the company owes an Army veteran $22.5 million for his hearing loss and tinnitus.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4356,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"\n

A verdict has been reached in the first of many cases involving military members getting defective hearing protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere (are) 250,000 individual lawsuits filed at this point in the Northern District of Florida,\u201d said Bryan Aylstock from the Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis and Overholtz law firm in Pensacola. They are the firm that is taking the lead in all of these individual suits against 3M, the manufacturer of the Combat Arms version 2 ear plugs that were used by the military from 2002 to 2015.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The plaintiffs in the cases are military members who have suffered hearing loss. The first of those cases has just ended with a verdict against 3M in federal court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo, it was three soldiers, all of whom served this country honorably and used these Combat Arms earplugs and suffered hearing damage\" said Aylstock. \"Collectively they received a little bit more than $7.1 million, which is a tremendous verdict. A lot of that was punitive damages, where the jury found by clear and convincing evidence that 3M\u2019s conduct as it relates to these ear plugs was reprehensible and deserved to be punished. And also a message needed to be sent to others, including 3M, who might try to do this in the future, that this is not an acceptable way to conduct your business.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the first lawsuit in what is called mass-tort litigation, which is different than a class-action suit, where all plaintiffs are represented in one law suit. There are two more already on the docket before Judge Casey Rodgers, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Florida in Pensacola.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere\u2019s a panel called The Judicial Panel for Multi-District Litigation, and it determined a couple of years ago that Pensacola was the appropriate forum to conduct all of the pretrial activities for all of the cases of this nature.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3M has already settled with the U.S.military for over $9 million, so the mass-tort litigation is only between the company and individual military members, both active duty and veterans. Aylstock fully expects this verdict to be appealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt will be appealed, and we feel confident that all of the pretrial rulings that Judge Rodgers made, and the trial rulings were appropriate, and the appellate court will also find that they were appropriate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since the verdict there have been no talks of settlement with 3M, so the trials and appeals will continue. Aylstock says he doesn\u2019t know how many rulings for the plaintiffs would bring 3M to the settlement table. Said Aylstock, \u201cIt will be as many as it takes.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second trial is set to begin on Monday. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Written By:<\/strong>
Bob Barrett
May 13th, 2021
Source<\/a>



<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","_et_gb_content_width":"2880","footnotes":""},"categories":[90,64,60,58,59,63,56,44],"tags":[41,130],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4364"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4364"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4364\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7849,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4364\/revisions\/7849"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}