{"id":4923,"date":"2022-06-26T20:54:00","date_gmt":"2022-06-26T20:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/?p=4923"},"modified":"2023-06-16T19:47:07","modified_gmt":"2023-06-16T19:47:07","slug":"3m-faces-potentially-billions-in-liabilities-over-7-63-earplugs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/3m-faces-potentially-billions-in-liabilities-over-7-63-earplugs\/","title":{"rendered":"3M Faces Potentially Billions in Liabilities Over $7.63 Earplugs"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” sticky_enabled=”0″][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.20.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” sticky_enabled=”0″][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” custom_padding=”0px|25px|25px|25px|false|true” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n

Company to begin court-ordered settlement talks over military earplugs, following lawsuits by thousands of veterans<\/span><\/h2>\n

More than 100,000 U.S. military veterans\u00a0have filed lawsuits against Minnesota-based 3M<\/a>\u00a0over hearing damage linked to what they claim are defects in the company\u2019s military-grade earplugs. The company faces billions of dollars in potential costs from legal settlements or trials after soldiers alleged they returned from war with hearing damage due to the earplugs, which the government bought for around $7.63 a pair.<\/u><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n

3M is set to begin court-ordered negotiations next month with lawyers representing soldiers who used the earplugs. The lawsuits are weighing on 3M shares, analysts said, and signal a warning to other manufacturers that liability risks may outweigh the gains from making protective products.<\/span><\/p>\n

Earplug cases from across the country, involving dozens of lawyers, have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation based in Florida. There are currently around 107,000 active cases and an additional 127,000 cases that could move over to the active list if filing fees are paid and other steps are taken.<\/u><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n

3M said the earplugs work when soldiers are given proper training and use them as intended. The company also claimed it has a legal protection known as a government contractor defense, meaning that a supplier can\u2019t be held liable for manufacturing a product that the government requested.<\/p>\n

Eric Rucker, a 3M attorney, said the military is continuing to use newer versions of the 3M earplugs. \u201cThe product does work,\u201d he said. \u201cIt was designed based on our collaboration with the military.\u201d<\/p>\n

Bryan Aylstock, the court-appointed lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, said soldiers have hearing damage and ringing in the ears, known as tinnitus, after using the product. \u201cThis is a bad earplug,\u201d he said. \u201cMost juries look at the evidence and they award significant damages.\u201d<\/p>\n

Soldiers are given a hearing exam when they first join the military and annual exams afterward, which allows their hearing damage to be documented. At issue in the cases is whether soldiers\u2019 hearing issues are due to allegedly faulty earplugs, not wearing them enough, or something else entirely.<\/p>\n

The lawsuits, which also include a smaller number of consumers and police plaintiffs, started after 3M settled a case with the Justice Department. In July 2018, 3M agreed to pay $9.1 million to the U.S. government to resolve allegations that it knowingly sold the earplugs to the military without disclosing defects. 3M denied any wrongdoing or liability.<\/p>\n

Earlier this year, 3M appealed the ruling of a federal judge in Florida that the contractor defense doesn\u2019t apply because the military didn\u2019t offer reasonably precise specifications for the product. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has supported 3M\u2019s appeal, saying that weakening of the contractor defense could deter companies from making products for the military.<\/p>\n

Read the full article at the\u00a0<\/span>Wall Street Journal<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

More than 100,000 U.S. military veterans have filed lawsuits against Minnesota-based 3M over hearing damage linked to what they claim are defects in the company\u2019s military-grade earplugs. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4925,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"\n

A verdict has been reached in the first of many cases involving military members getting defective hearing protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere (are) 250,000 individual lawsuits filed at this point in the Northern District of Florida,\u201d said Bryan Aylstock from the Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis and Overholtz law firm in Pensacola. They are the firm that is taking the lead in all of these individual suits against 3M, the manufacturer of the Combat Arms version 2 ear plugs that were used by the military from 2002 to 2015.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The plaintiffs in the cases are military members who have suffered hearing loss. The first of those cases has just ended with a verdict against 3M in federal court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo, it was three soldiers, all of whom served this country honorably and used these Combat Arms earplugs and suffered hearing damage\" said Aylstock. \"Collectively they received a little bit more than $7.1 million, which is a tremendous verdict. A lot of that was punitive damages, where the jury found by clear and convincing evidence that 3M\u2019s conduct as it relates to these ear plugs was reprehensible and deserved to be punished. And also a message needed to be sent to others, including 3M, who might try to do this in the future, that this is not an acceptable way to conduct your business.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the first lawsuit in what is called mass-tort litigation, which is different than a class-action suit, where all plaintiffs are represented in one law suit. There are two more already on the docket before Judge Casey Rodgers, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Florida in Pensacola.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere\u2019s a panel called The Judicial Panel for Multi-District Litigation, and it determined a couple of years ago that Pensacola was the appropriate forum to conduct all of the pretrial activities for all of the cases of this nature.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3M has already settled with the U.S.military for over $9 million, so the mass-tort litigation is only between the company and individual military members, both active duty and veterans. Aylstock fully expects this verdict to be appealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt will be appealed, and we feel confident that all of the pretrial rulings that Judge Rodgers made, and the trial rulings were appropriate, and the appellate court will also find that they were appropriate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since the verdict there have been no talks of settlement with 3M, so the trials and appeals will continue. Aylstock says he doesn\u2019t know how many rulings for the plaintiffs would bring 3M to the settlement table. Said Aylstock, \u201cIt will be as many as it takes.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second trial is set to begin on Monday. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Written By:<\/strong>
Bob Barrett
May 13th, 2021
Source<\/a>



<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","_et_gb_content_width":"2880","footnotes":""},"categories":[58,90,64,60,59,63,56,44],"tags":[41,152,130],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4923"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7837,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923\/revisions\/7837"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}