{"id":5458,"date":"2022-08-18T15:32:28","date_gmt":"2022-08-18T15:32:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/?p=5458"},"modified":"2023-06-16T19:33:13","modified_gmt":"2023-06-16T19:33:13","slug":"florida-judge-wont-block-3m-from-asking-bankruptcy-judge-to-stop-earplug-suits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/florida-judge-wont-block-3m-from-asking-bankruptcy-judge-to-stop-earplug-suits\/","title":{"rendered":"Florida judge won’t block 3M from asking bankruptcy judge to stop earplug suits"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.20.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n

(Reuters) – A federal judge in Florida on Tuesday denied a veteran’s bid to block 3M Co from asking a U.S. bankruptcy court in Indiana to stop the mass tort litigation over its military-issue earplugs.<\/p>\n

The decision by U.S. District Judge M. Casey Rodgers in Pensacola, who is overseeing about 230,000 lawsuits claiming the earplugs cause hearing loss, removes one potential hurdle to the Minnesota company’s plan to resolve the lawsuits through the bankruptcy of its subsidiary Aearo Technologies LLC, the original maker of earplugs, rather than in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) before Rodgers.<\/p>\n

Veteran Richard Valle had\u00a0<\/span>asked<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>Rodgers to block the company’s plan earlier this month. He argued that the company was trying to dodge her jurisdiction simply because it did not like the results of the MDL so far, which has seen plaintiffs win 10 out of 16 trials and reap $265 million in combined awards for 13 service members.<\/p>\n

Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Jeffrey Graham in Indianapolis is currently considering whether to issue an order shielding 3M, which is not bankrupt, from the lawsuits.<\/p>\n

Rodgers, who has been\u00a0<\/span>harshly critical<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>of 3M’s strategy, said that while she believed she had the authority to bar 3M from seeking protection, the bankruptcy court was “well-qualified and aptly suited” to decide the issue.<\/p>\n

Rodgers instead issued a narrower order prohibiting 3M from asking the bankruptcy court to relitigate any issues she had already decided. She noted that Aearo said in a\u00a0<\/span>filing<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>last month that the bankruptcy court could resolve the claims based on a “fair and complete evidentiary record,” while attacking Rodgers’ rulings on evidentiary issues.<\/p>\n

Rodgers said for the company to seek more favorable rulings in the bankruptcy court was a threat to her jurisdiction that “cannot and will not be countenanced.”<\/p>\n

Christopher Seeger of Seeger Weiss and Bryan Aylstock of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz, lawyers for plaintiffs in the litigation, said they were pleased with the ruling.<\/p>\n

\n

“We continue to believe that 3M should not receive the benefit of a stay in the litigation considering it is far from a bankrupt defendant, and we will pursue all available remedies to hold them accountable,” they said.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

3M had no immediate comment.<\/p>\n

Aearo\u00a0<\/span>filed<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>for bankruptcy on July 26 and said it had committed $1 billion to resolve the earplug litigation. Days before the filing, it entered into an agreement to indemnify 3M for all liability related to the Combat Arms Earplugs Version 2 (CAEv2).<\/p>\n

3M, which has denied liability, has argued that the earplug cases should now be resolved in bankruptcy court and called the MDL “broken beyond repair.”<\/p>\n

The case is In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Products Liability Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida, No. 19-md-2885.<\/p>\n

Read the full article at Reuters<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A federal judge in Florida on Tuesday denied a veteran\u2019s bid to block 3M Co from asking a U.S. bankruptcy court<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4555,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"\n

A verdict has been reached in the first of many cases involving military members getting defective hearing protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere (are) 250,000 individual lawsuits filed at this point in the Northern District of Florida,\u201d said Bryan Aylstock from the Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis and Overholtz law firm in Pensacola. They are the firm that is taking the lead in all of these individual suits against 3M, the manufacturer of the Combat Arms version 2 ear plugs that were used by the military from 2002 to 2015.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The plaintiffs in the cases are military members who have suffered hearing loss. The first of those cases has just ended with a verdict against 3M in federal court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo, it was three soldiers, all of whom served this country honorably and used these Combat Arms earplugs and suffered hearing damage\" said Aylstock. \"Collectively they received a little bit more than $7.1 million, which is a tremendous verdict. A lot of that was punitive damages, where the jury found by clear and convincing evidence that 3M\u2019s conduct as it relates to these ear plugs was reprehensible and deserved to be punished. And also a message needed to be sent to others, including 3M, who might try to do this in the future, that this is not an acceptable way to conduct your business.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the first lawsuit in what is called mass-tort litigation, which is different than a class-action suit, where all plaintiffs are represented in one law suit. There are two more already on the docket before Judge Casey Rodgers, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Florida in Pensacola.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere\u2019s a panel called The Judicial Panel for Multi-District Litigation, and it determined a couple of years ago that Pensacola was the appropriate forum to conduct all of the pretrial activities for all of the cases of this nature.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3M has already settled with the U.S.military for over $9 million, so the mass-tort litigation is only between the company and individual military members, both active duty and veterans. Aylstock fully expects this verdict to be appealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt will be appealed, and we feel confident that all of the pretrial rulings that Judge Rodgers made, and the trial rulings were appropriate, and the appellate court will also find that they were appropriate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since the verdict there have been no talks of settlement with 3M, so the trials and appeals will continue. Aylstock says he doesn\u2019t know how many rulings for the plaintiffs would bring 3M to the settlement table. Said Aylstock, \u201cIt will be as many as it takes.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second trial is set to begin on Monday. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Written By:<\/strong>
Bob Barrett
May 13th, 2021
Source<\/a>



<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","_et_gb_content_width":"2880","footnotes":""},"categories":[58,90,64,60,59,63,56,44],"tags":[41,152,130],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5458"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5458"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5458\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7832,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5458\/revisions\/7832"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.awkolaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}